Vince,why the different sound quality between Seattle &
Posted: Thu Jun 08, 2006 6:48 pm
Hi Vince-
I realize you probably will have no idea,but i thought i would put this quesytion up anyway.Perhaps someone knows for sure or,you know,speculation is always intriguing also.
So,my question is in regards to the Seattle and Vancouver Shows that you recorded.Why does Seattle seem to have a "higher fidelity" sound to it,where-as Vancouver sounds.sort of "low-fi"?Almost as if when this particular shows was transfered onto whatever a dolby button was pushed,muffling the sounds.
Vancouver sounds alot like Bakersfield.Well,the songs that i have heard from there.Infact,Seattle was recorded first and then Vancouver and Bakserfield.Perhaps after the Seattle taping you used different equitment?
Just curious.Always have been about these 2 shows because the quality of the sound is so different yet you recorded them both and they were recorded one night later.
If you or anyone could shed light on this,i would be more then interested in hearing from you or anyone.
Thansk.
I realize you probably will have no idea,but i thought i would put this quesytion up anyway.Perhaps someone knows for sure or,you know,speculation is always intriguing also.
So,my question is in regards to the Seattle and Vancouver Shows that you recorded.Why does Seattle seem to have a "higher fidelity" sound to it,where-as Vancouver sounds.sort of "low-fi"?Almost as if when this particular shows was transfered onto whatever a dolby button was pushed,muffling the sounds.
Vancouver sounds alot like Bakersfield.Well,the songs that i have heard from there.Infact,Seattle was recorded first and then Vancouver and Bakserfield.Perhaps after the Seattle taping you used different equitment?
Just curious.Always have been about these 2 shows because the quality of the sound is so different yet you recorded them both and they were recorded one night later.
If you or anyone could shed light on this,i would be more then interested in hearing from you or anyone.
Thansk.